Most Graph RAG discussions are still around ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ช๐ค๐ฉ ๐จ๐ณ๐ข๐ฑ๐ฉ ๐ฅ๐ข๐ต๐ข๐ฃ๐ด๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ถ๐ด๐ฆ? Serious architecture asks: Which graph structure fits the retrieval job? That is the Graph-Type Fit Pattern. The mistake is thinking โgraphโ is a feature.
Samyama: A Unified Graph-Vector Database with In-Database...
Modern data architectures are fragmented across graph databases, vector stores, analytics engines, and optimization solvers, resulting in complex ETL pipelines and synchronization overhead. We...
Ontology Learning and Knowledge Graph Construction: A Comparison...
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems combine Large Language Models (LLMs) with external knowledge, and their performance depends heavily on how that knowledge is represented. This study...
Observe first, model later (late Semantic Binding) | LinkedIn
In this post, I want to draw attention to what I think is a very important, yet under-appreciated, aspect of the Semantic Web. Let's start with a brief intro to a latter, for whom is not familiar with it.
The AI Knowledge Framework (AIKF) Purpose-Driven Enterprise AI Operating Model
Over the past several years Iโve been thinking about how AI systems will actually operate inside real enterprises.
Most discussions focus on models, pipelines, or agents. Those things matter, but they only describe parts of the system.
Enterprises donโt operate on probability alone. They operate within defined objectives, authority structures, and governance processes. That raises a different architectural question.
How should probabilistic AI reasoning operate inside institutions that ultimately make decisions through governed processes?
The article below outlines a framework Iโve been developing called the AI Knowledge Framework (AIKF). It connects five parts of enterprise AI architecture that are often discussed separately:
- Purpose
- Meaning
- Evidence
- Reasoning
- Governance
The central idea is straightforward. AI systems are good at discovering patterns and generating evidence. Institutions remain responsible for determining meaning, responsibility, and consequences. Purpose defines the boundaries within which AI reasoning operates.
Iโd be interested in hearing how others working on enterprise ontologies, knowledge graphs, semantic architectures, or governed AI systems are thinking about these issues.
| 43 comments on LinkedIn
the core AI Knowledge Framework (AIKF) Purpose-Driven Enterprise AI Operating Model
Visualise any GitHub repo as a graph.
Simply replace "github" with "gitcgr" in the repo URL.
This gives you an interactive graph of the entire codebase structure, with functions, classes, modules, and their relationships all laid out visually.
Internally, it's powered by Code-Graph-RAG, an open-source system that does deep code analysis under the hood:
- It uses Tree-sitter to parse your codebase across multiple languages.
- Builds a full knowledge graph of your repo in Memgraph.
- Lets you query your codebase in natural language.
Code-Graph-RAG also works as an MCP server, which means you can plug it directly into Claude Code and query or edit your codebase using natural language from your terminal.
___
Interested in ML/AI Engineering? I have put together a free PDF (380+ pages) with 150+ core lessons. Find it in the comments!
___
Share this with your network if you found this insightful โป๏ธ
Find me โ Avi Chawla. Every day, I share tutorials and insights on DS, ML, LLMs, and RAGs. | 10 comments on LinkedIn
Is Palantir onto something, or are they just blowing hot air?
You may have heard the term Ontology, and why leading businesses rely on them to build trustworthy data models. Recent advances in LLMs have made it possible for startups and enterprises alike to build flexible, reliable semantic layers faster
From Berlin to San Francisco On the same day, two technical communities one in Berlin and one in San Francisco gathered to discuss the same architectural question: how should memory be designed for agentic AIย systems? In Berlin, AI Memory andโฆ Readย moreย โ
Learn how context graphs capture decision reasoning and situational awareness to power AI agents with episodic memory. Build production-ready context graphs with FalkorDB.
Let's roll up our sleeves and follow up on my last post in some more detail. The many qualitatively different types of relations in a rich knowledge graph are the crux of how it adds significant value above and beyond a list of categories or a taxonomy.
Budget for Semantic Capabilities is Non-Negotiable
Budget for Semantic Capabilities is Non-Negotiable! Music to my ears!!
Scratching your head on how to start? Take a look at the 20 lessons learned from 20 years of building knowledge graphs and ontologies.
https://lnkd.in/g_y5KMVm
This may be new to you. But there is a large community who have been working with semantics and doing this in production for a while. For example, see all the companies that presented at Connected Data London and The Knowledge Graph Conference last year.
Take a look at my trip report for more details on those companies and what they are doing
https://lnkd.in/gFQZQhyE
You donโt have to be on this semantic journey by yourself. This is moment to leverage the community!
Budget for Semantic Capabilities is Non-Negotiable
Evaluating Codebase-Oriented RAG through Knowledge Graph Analysis [Part 1]
Crack open your codebase RAG with a knowledge graph analysis that illustrates hidden inheritance chains, hub detection, and more in this 2-part blog series.
KuzuDB for Production AI Agents: Our Fork, the Benchmarks, and Why Graph Memory Works
KuzuDB was archived in October 2025. Vela Partners forked it with concurrent write support for multi-agent workloads. Benchmarks show 374x faster path queries than Neo4j. Full architecture guide for AI agent memory on graph databases.
GRAPH TYPE - Schema enforcement made easy (Preview) - Graph Database & Analytics
Neo4j databases are famous for being schema-optional and developers love the flexibility this gives them to get up and running fast. But eventually, itโs time to go to productionโฆ and you need rules. You need structure. You need to enforceโฆ Readย moreย โ
The W3C Context Graph Community Group defines context as measurable incomplete and/or incoherent information between systems
Before Shannon, "information" meant whatever people wanted it to mean โ knowledge, facts, news, data.
In the W3C Context Graph Community Group, we're changing that. We define context as measurable incomplete and/or incoherent information between systems